Under what circumstances can an Arizona court exercise personal jurisdiction?

An Arizona court can exercise personal jurisdiction in accordance with the maximum extent permitted by both the United States and Arizona Constitutions. This is fundamental because personal jurisdiction is derived from constitutional principles that protect individuals from being brought into a jurisdiction without proper notice or an adequate connection to that jurisdiction.

As a result, the court's ability to assert jurisdiction extends to any party, provided there is sufficient contact with the state or if the action meets certain due process considerations. This reflects the principle of "minimum contacts," which signifies that a defendant’s connections with the forum state must be such that the maintenance of a lawsuit does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.

This approach allows courts to consider various factors, such as where the events giving rise to the claim occurred, where the parties are based, and any relevant business or personal interactions that tie a party to Arizona. In essence, the jurisdiction is not restricted solely to parties physically located within Arizona or limited to parties with prior consent; it is broader and considers the overall relationship to the state, grounded in constitutional standards.