What are alternative means of service allowed for?

Alternative means of service are allowed when service through specified methods is impracticable. This situation typically arises when traditional methods of serving documents, such as personal service or service by mail, cannot reasonably be executed due to circumstances like the defendant's unavailability, evasiveness, or if the address on file is incorrect.

When the prescribed methods of service are not feasible, courts recognize the need for alternative methods to ensure that the defendant is still informed of the legal action without unnecessary delays. These alternative methods might include service by publication, email, or any other method deemed appropriate by the court that ensures the party receives notice.

The other choices do not capture the comprehensive nature of when alternative means can be utilized. Specifically, simply not being able to find someone is too narrow, and requiring the defendant to agree to accept service limits the scope of service options. Furthermore, the fact that the court may be closed for holidays does not inherently justify the use of alternative service methods, as service requirements generally proceed irrespective of court closures.