What is a potential outcome of an electronic filing rejection?

The correct outcome of an electronic filing rejection is that the filing party must refile the document after making the necessary corrections. When a document is electronically submitted to a court and is rejected, it typically indicates that there are errors or issues that need to be addressed before the filing can be accepted. This process ensures that all documents meet the court's requirements for formatting, content, or completeness.

The filing party is responsible for reviewing the rejection notice, understanding the reasons for the rejection, and making the appropriate changes to the document. Once corrected, they must then resubmit the filing for consideration. This step is vital because the court cannot process filings that do not comply with its procedures.

The other outcomes listed do not accurately reflect the typical process following a rejection of an electronic filing. For example, automatic reconsideration does not occur without the filing party taking action. Similarly, archiving a rejected filing is not a standard procedure, as rejections imply that the document was not filed with the court, and thus, it does not get archived. Lastly, while court officers assist in various capacities, they do not take action on behalf of the party regarding corrections needed from a rejection; the responsibility lies with the filing party.