What might the court grant in a special detainer action apart from damages?

In a special detainer action, the court typically aims to resolve disputes regarding possession of a property. The correct answer highlights that the court may grant a writ of restitution, which is an order for the physical restoration of the premises to the landlord or property owner. This is an essential tool that allows the rightful possessor to regain control of the property quickly.

Additionally, the inclusion of attorney fees and costs as part of the judgment is important because it compensates the prevailing party for legal expenses incurred due to the proceedings. Courts often recognize the financial burden that leasing disputes can impose on parties involved, making it a common practice to award these fees to ensure a fair outcome.

The other options do not encapsulate the broader range of remedies typically available in a special detainer action. For instance, while restitution of the premises is indeed a potential outcome, it does not necessarily address associated costs like attorney fees, which are also significant in resolving such disputes. The mention of only attorney fees overlooks the court's role in restoring possession of the property, which is a critical aspect of these actions. Lastly, suggesting that no other orders are available misunderstands the potential range of remedies that a court can provide, reflecting the multifaceted nature of property disputes and the court's broad