What must be done when seizing property if no person is named as a defendant?

In situations where property is seized and no specific individual is named as a defendant, it is essential to serve the individual who had custody of the property at the time of the seizure. This step is crucial for ensuring that the legal process surrounding the seizure is properly followed and that any claims or defenses can be formally presented. By serving the custodian of the property, you are providing them with notice of the action being taken and their opportunity to respond, which is a foundational principle in due process.

This approach helps establish a clear legal line of communication with the party who had control over the property, facilitating the resolution of any disputes regarding ownership or custody. It also supports a transparent legal process, allowing the custodian to assert their rights or present any defenses they may have regarding the property.

In contrast, the other options may not adequately address the necessary legal procedures. Notifying the police department does not directly relate to the process of serving the involved parties. Filing a motion to designate a defendant may introduce unnecessary complexity if the primary goal is to address the custodian's rights, and waiting for the property owner to come forward does not proactively address the legal implications of the seizure. Thus, serving the custodian ensures an efficient and legally sound approach to handling the situation