Which of the following is NOT considered a reason for interfering with judicial proceedings?

Attending a court session quietly is not considered a reason for interfering with judicial proceedings because it demonstrates respect for the court's process and maintains the decorum necessary for judicial activities. The role of a court is to conduct proceedings in an orderly manner, and the presence of individuals who do not disrupt or challenge the authority of the court contributes positively to this environment.

In contrast, the other options involve actions that directly undermine the integrity of the judicial process. Refusing to be sworn in as a witness obstructs the court’s ability to gather all pertinent information, which is crucial for delivering justice. Publishing a false report of a court proceeding misleads the public and can distort the perception of the legal process, potentially influencing jurors or witnesses inappropriately. Engaging in disorderly behavior disrupts the proceedings and can hinder the court's operations. Thus, while the first three options directly obstruct judicial functions, attending a courtroom session quietly aligns with the principles of respect and order that are essential in a judicial setting.